
South Africa’s Nuclear Ambition represents a concerted effort to diversify its energy mix, reinforce grid stability, and reduce carbon emissions in concert with renewable energy expansion. Nuclear energy is viewed as a key component in diversifying the baseload energy mix and complementing renewable energy sources due to its ability to provide stable, uninterrupted power irrespective of weather. However, success hinges on transparent governance, realistic financing, and navigating geopolitical sensitivities, all while balancing technological innovation and public trust.
There are technical, political, and economic layers behind the push for nuclear as a cleaner energy source
South Africa’s nuclear ambitions
- Why Nuclear, and Why Now?
- Energy crisis backdrop: South Africa has faced rolling blackouts (load-shedding) for over 15 years due to aging coal plants and underinvestment in new capacity. Coal still supplies ~80% of electricity.
- Climate commitments: Under the Paris Agreement, South Africa has pledged to peak emissions between 2025–2030 and achieve net-zero by 2050. Nuclear offers baseload power without CO₂ emissions, complementing variable renewables like wind and solar.
- Energy security: Nuclear is viewed as a way to reduce dependence on coal while avoiding over-reliance on intermittent renewables or imported gas.
- Current Nuclear Infrastructure
- Koeberg Nuclear Power Station (near Cape Town):
- Africa’s only commercial nuclear plant, commissioned in the 1980s.
- Produces 1,860 MW (~5% of national supply).
- Recently underwent a life-extension program costing billions of rand. Unit 1’s license extended to 2045, Unit 2 pending approval by 2025.
Image Source: ESI-African.com
- SAFARI-1 Research Reactor:
- Operational since 1965, produces medical isotopes for cancer treatment.
- Will be replaced by a Multi-Purpose Reactor (MPR) by 2030, budgeted at R60 billion, with R1.2 billion already allocated.
- The Duynefontein nuclear project is South Africa’s boldest step yet toward scaling up nuclear power. But it faces massive financial, political, and regulatory hurdles, real electricity from this station is likely a 2040s story rather than 2030s.
- Expansion Plans
- 2019 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP): set out to add 2,500 MW of nuclear power through large-scale projects or small modular reactors (SMRs).
- Draft IRP 2023: includes pathways for up to 14,500 MW by 2050, though this is only one scenario, showing long-term ambition.
- August 2024: Procurement temporarily paused after environmental groups challenged the process in court for lack of public consultation.
- December 2023 onward: South Africa began vendor engagement, inviting proposals from global suppliers.
- February 2025: Energy Minister confirmed Russia and Iran could bid, raising geopolitical concerns (possible U.S. sanctions risk).
- August 2025: South Africa officially advanced plans for a new nuclear plant near Cape Town.
- Technological Focus
- Small Modular Reactors (SMRs):
- Seen as a more flexible, cost-effective option compared to massive reactors.
- Could be deployed near mines, industrial hubs, or remote areas.
- South Africa’s uranium resources make local fuel supply possible.
Image Source: www.civilsdaily.com
- Uranium Value Chain:
- Partnerships aim to build a nuclear fuel supply chain, tapping into South Africa’s uranium mining capacity.
- Future Research & Development:
- The MPR project will enable isotope production, nuclear medicine, and research into advanced nuclear technologies.
- Legislative, Institutional & Policy Context
- National Infrastructure Plan 2050 (NIP 2050): positions nuclear alongside solar and wind as core future energy pillars.
- G20 Presidency 2025: in 2025 provided a platform to advance nuclear energy dialogue in “global clean energy transition talks” with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) collaborating on nuclear’s role in clean energy transition initiatives.
- At a G20 Energy Transition event, Minister Kgosientsho Ramokgopa highlighted nuclear energy as essential for energy security, sovereignty, and inclusive development.
- IAEA Partnership: supporting South Africa with safety, regulatory frameworks, and technology transfer.
- Infrastructure plans like NIP 2050 envision a future energy system where wind, solar, and nuclear play central roles, alongside initiatives like replacing the SAFARI-1 research reactor with a modern Multi-Purpose Rector (MPR) by 2030.
- A significant R60 billion investment (with R1.2 billion allocated immediately) has been earmarked for developing the MPR, which would enhance capabilities in research, medical isotope production, and future energy applications
- Challenges & Criticisms
- High Costs: Nuclear projects often overrun. Critics argue funds could be better spent on renewables + storage.
- Waste management: South Africa stores nuclear waste at Vaalputs repository, but long-term solutions remain unclear.
- Public opposition: Environmental NGOs (SAFCEI, Earthlife Africa) challenge lack of transparency and risks to communities.
- Geopolitical risks: Partnering with Russia or Iran may jeopardize relations with Western allies and access to certain technologies.
- Grid integration: Adding large nuclear units requires grid upgrades, while SMRs would need regulatory approval frameworks still under development.
- Strategic Partnerships in the Nuclear Value Chain
- Agreements between C5 Capital and Sibanye-Stillwater aim to bolster uranium production tailored for SMRs and strengthen South Africa’s nuclear fuel supply chain.
- Strategic Implications
- For Energy Security: Provides stable baseload to balance renewables.
- For Economy: Could create tens of thousands of jobs in construction, fuel processing, and operations.
- For Climate Goals: Aligns with South Africa’s net-zero 2050 pathway.
- For Geopolitics: Nuclear choices could tilt South Africa’s alliances toward BRICS partners (Russia, China, Iran) over Western collaboration.
Image Source: www.istockphoto.com
Quick Glance – Nuclear vs Alternatives in South Africa
Source | Pros | Cons |
Nuclear | Baseload, low-carbon, local uranium | High cost, long build time, waste issues |
Coal | Reliable, domestic supply | High emissions, aging plants, pollution |
Solar/Wind | Cheap, fast to deploy, abundant resource | Intermittent, storage needed |
Gas | Flexible, quicker build | Import reliance, methane emissions |
South Africa’s nuclear ambition pushes it ahead with new Cape nuclear plant- a new 4,000 MW nuclear power station at Duyne fountain
South Africa is advancing plans to build a new nuclear power station at Duynefontein, near Cape Town, with a capacity of 4,000 megawatts (MW). This new plant will be situated adjacent to the existing Koeberg nuclear power station. The project has recently received a significant boost with the South African Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Dion George, upholding the 2017 environmental authorization for Eskom, the state-owned power utility, to build and operate this new facility.
Image Source: africasustainabilitymatters.com
The Duynefontein site was assessed through a thorough Environmental Impact Assessment, and despite challenges from environmental groups, the minister dismissed appeals against the original decision.
The new facility is expected to more than double South Africa’s nuclear output, strengthening the country’s energy security amid chronic load shedding and ageing coal plants.
However, Eskom still needs to obtain various other licenses and permits before construction can commence, including a nuclear installation license from the National Nuclear Regulator, approval from the National Energy Regulator of South Africa, water use licenses, and others.
The entire project is estimated to cost around R60 billion and reflects South Africa’s long-term commitment to strengthening its energy infrastructure while addressing environmental and social factors.
summary
The broader context includes South Africa’s ambition to expand nuclear capacity significantly as part of its energy strategy to reduce reliance on coal and support climate-friendly energy transition. The overall nuclear new build program aims for a capacity of at least 10 GW, with this Duynefontein project seen as a critical first step.
South Africa is actively progressing with plans aimed at bolstering energy security and supporting a low-carbon energy transition.
Join us: our mission is to provide accurate, up-to-date, and reliable information. We firmly believe in transparency and authenticity in all our content and interactions.
Connect now and take the next step toward professional excellence!
Visit our website: www.keninstitute.com
Get in touch with us at: info@keninstitute.com
Call us on +917569034271
Let’s connect together on: Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Instagram.